It is well established that humans and other animals may treat two perceptually different cues alike, if the cues have been individually paired with a common antecedent or a common consequence. Recently, Molet et al. (Psychon Bull Rev 18:618-623, 2011) reported evidence for a new form of acquired equivalence in human conditional discrimination, namely context-mediated equivalence. In the present research, using a flavor conditioning procedure, we asked whether rats would show similar context-mediated equivalence to demonstrate that this new form of acquired equivalence is a general phenomenon. Rats experienced two flavor cues A and B each presented either in the same context, X, or each in its own distinctive context, X or Y. Subsequently, the rats experienced B with sucrose in a third context, Z, and then the generalization of conditioning to A was assessed. When tested in Context Z, consumption of A was more marked when A and B had both been presented in the same context than when they had been presented in two different contexts. Thus, importantly, in the absence of the training context, cues that shared a common context at different times came to be treated as equivalent. This represents the first evidence of context-mediated equivalence in a nonhuman species.